<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ugly New Google</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nicewebpage.com/blog/ugly-new-google/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nicewebpage.com/blog/ugly-new-google/</link>
	<description>The road to success is always under construction. </description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 12:20:30 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Manny</title>
		<link>http://nicewebpage.com/blog/ugly-new-google/comment-page-1/#comment-3151</link>
		<dc:creator>Manny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jun 2010 07:56:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nicewebpage.com/blog/?p=440#comment-3151</guid>
		<description>The reason for the new logo is because you now have the option change background images in Google. The old drop shadow look could conflict with that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The reason for the new logo is because you now have the option change background images in Google. The old drop shadow look could conflict with that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cactus Jack</title>
		<link>http://nicewebpage.com/blog/ugly-new-google/comment-page-1/#comment-3077</link>
		<dc:creator>Cactus Jack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2010 17:20:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nicewebpage.com/blog/?p=440#comment-3077</guid>
		<description>It really doesn&#039;t bother me much. They just eliminated the drop shadows from the old logo. I agree the new sidebar is something only a few of use will use. It does however make it easier for people to rip off their desired artwork with that new color pallet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It really doesn&#8217;t bother me much. They just eliminated the drop shadows from the old logo. I agree the new sidebar is something only a few of use will use. It does however make it easier for people to rip off their desired artwork with that new color pallet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug from Ohio</title>
		<link>http://nicewebpage.com/blog/ugly-new-google/comment-page-1/#comment-3057</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug from Ohio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 May 2010 18:37:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nicewebpage.com/blog/?p=440#comment-3057</guid>
		<description>I kinda like the new Google sidebar. It give&#039;s you  more flexible options on whatever kind of photo you want to do a search with. Say you&#039;re looking for only red photos that will match your search query. Click on the little red box and all the photos that match your search will be red. Much useful for the graphic designer. Anyhow, I do agree with you that the new logo needs some work. Doug in Ohio</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I kinda like the new Google sidebar. It give&#8217;s you  more flexible options on whatever kind of photo you want to do a search with. Say you&#8217;re looking for only red photos that will match your search query. Click on the little red box and all the photos that match your search will be red. Much useful for the graphic designer. Anyhow, I do agree with you that the new logo needs some work. Doug in Ohio</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://nicewebpage.com/blog/ugly-new-google/comment-page-1/#comment-3029</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 May 2010 20:32:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nicewebpage.com/blog/?p=440#comment-3029</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think they&#039;ll change anything back, nor give us the option to do so in the preferences. I guess it is still tolerable to do searches but indeed 50% less attractive than before. Oh well?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think they&#8217;ll change anything back, nor give us the option to do so in the preferences. I guess it is still tolerable to do searches but indeed 50% less attractive than before. Oh well?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken kennedy</title>
		<link>http://nicewebpage.com/blog/ugly-new-google/comment-page-1/#comment-3001</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken kennedy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 May 2010 20:30:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nicewebpage.com/blog/?p=440#comment-3001</guid>
		<description>Yes sir, I am very disappointed that Google decided to go with this new look. I actually wouldn&#039;t doubt if their design team were smoking some kind of wacky tobacco which possessed them to actually go public with this hideous scheme. I foresee in the near future that Google will probably go back to the old layout or something close by popular demand.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes sir, I am very disappointed that Google decided to go with this new look. I actually wouldn&#8217;t doubt if their design team were smoking some kind of wacky tobacco which possessed them to actually go public with this hideous scheme. I foresee in the near future that Google will probably go back to the old layout or something close by popular demand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

